Germany is entering a decisive phase in the review of its gambling framework. The GlüStV 2021 (Interstate Treaty on Gambling), in force since July 1, 2021, is set for formal evaluation before December 31, 2026, following mounting evidence that its restrictions are limiting the competitiveness of the regulated market. The key issue today: channelization is estimated at around 77%, meaning nearly one in four euros wagered online is flowing outside the legal system, according to recent data cited by the GGL.
The treaty legalized online sports betting, virtual slots, and poker under a highly restrictive framework that remains in place in 2026: a €1 stake limit per spin on slots, mandatory 5-second delays between plays, and a €1,000 monthly deposit cap, extendable up to €30,000 under strict conditions. Additionally, the 5.3% stake tax continues to weigh on operators, widely regarded as the main factor reducing margins and competitiveness against offshore platforms.
Oversight is handled by the GGL, chaired by Sandro Kirchner (since 2025), with Ronald Benter serving as CEO, in coordination with Germany’s 16 federal states, which are currently leading the technical review process. Key industry voices shaping the debate include Luka Andric (German Sports Betting Association), Simon Priglinger-Simader (German Online Casino Association), Michelle Hembury (Melchers), Dr. Gabriele Stark-Lütke Schwienhorst (CMS), alongside experts such as Chris Elliott, Melanie Ellis, and Wulf Hambach, all pointing to the need for regulatory adjustments.
Economically, Germany remains one of Europe’s largest regulated gambling markets, generating approximately €14 billion annually in 2025, with more than €7 billion in tax contributions. However, the structural issue persists in current regulations are not capturing full market demand.
The ongoing review does not aim to dismantle the system, but to recalibrate it. Discussions include adjustments to deposit limits, product restrictions, enforcement tools, and a potential shift from a stake-based tax to a GGR-based model. The prevailing consensus is clear: without a competitive legal market, regulatory control weakens.
