Coljuegos About penalties for inaccuracy. It is probable that on a purely philosophical level we seem to find no unity of judgment sense around the concept of justice, for example for Plato said ideal of "justice" would be achieved as long as the man came out of the darkness of the cave, is to say, of the ignorance, because that is when the man only can accede to the truth, is able to be just, thus the wisdom of the governor would not be based only on the clarity of the concepts of the exercise of his power but also in the discovery of the truth of the facts (for this you have to understand very well the facts that make up that truth).

Meanwhile for the philosopher Aristotle, justice would be to give each citizen what corresponds to him according to his needs and contribute in society. But, on the other hand, for Kant the justice of a State must ensure three fundamental principles: the freedom of individuals, the equality between them and the independence of each member of a community.

However, although many would remain with this last idea of justice as it is considered advanced, and that is not in vain the basis of the "modern state", it is enough with the most basic of these conceptions, which Plato offers us with his allegory of the cavern, to understand that what is happening today with many of the sanctioning administrative acts that COLJUEGOS has issued within the framework of the processes that it has been carrying out due to alleged inaccuracy in the settlement, declaration and payment of operating rights and administrative expenses, against different concessionaires, it is A TOTAL INJUSTICE.

Those punishable acts by alleged inaccuracy, or at least all that I have known, conclude with the inexorable order to pay a certain additional value to the liquidated and paid many months ago, under penalty of incurring penalties, in all cases , include the inability to contract with the State for a minimum term of 5 years, only for the fact that, supposedly, the value to be paid was greater than that which was actually settled and paid by the operator, but what is the most horrible of everything this is that the only reason offered by the state entity to impose its truth, is that it has established a greater value to pay different from the liquidated and paid by the operator, that is, its truth against the entrepreneur, who actually , this last one is the one that has the immediacy of the facts, because it is the one that has been perceiving the reality directly as it appears in the day to day.

The worst of all is that, as we all know, COLJUEGOS has been building this system, starting precisely from the knowledge it has been acquiring little by little, especially from the one that it has been incorporating through the hiring of competent personnel in certain areas, as well as of the interaction of the guilds in the different discussion tables and even of the demands and processes that have been brought against them.

In this order of ideas, COLJUEGOS today liquidates in one way, but before liquidated another very different; moreover, I would dare to say that the way it is settled today differs greatly in the way it liquidated COLJUEGOS based on the famous liquidation card that it issued at the end of 2016, including the one established with the protocol of liquidation that it adopted through the resolution that it subsequently issued.

In short it has been clear the traceability that has had the process of perfecting that has had the entity around the method and the formulas used for the liquidation of the rights of exploitation, but has been applying half sanctions for alleged inaccuracies in the liquidations, when even they have been faithful to the suggested liquidation, being that the previous ones were based on the low knowledge of the arithmetic factors that made them, or what is the same, in the low knowledge of the mathematics so complex that has been establishing the same COLJUEGOS through its transition from the obscurantism of the cave to the light of the truth that even today is not so intense.

As it should be if there is a clearly established process to carry out such liquidations, as is the case in other areas such as those that are the responsibility of the DIAN.

Blind precisely because of the brightness of the truth, revealed with irony by an ex-employee of COLJUEGOS, (Heyby Poveda Ferro) when he was in another public sphere1 when referring to the principle of the "spirit of justice" contained in Article 683 of the Tax Statute, We reaffirm the reason why we do not understand the hard work with which COLJUEGOS is launched at the ready against businessmen when neither the same entity at that time understood the way how today was arranged the way in which operating rights and administrative expenses had to be paid, but let's see the appointment that the ex-employee makes to understand that she speaks for herself of the absence of justice in all this:

"Article 683 Tax Statute: SPIRIT OF JUSTICE Public officials, with powers and duties to fulfill in relation to the liquidation and collection of rational taxes, must always have as a rule in the exercise of their activities that they are public servants, that the Straight application of the laws must be presided over by a relevant spirit of justice, and that the State does not aspire that the taxpayer be required more than that with which the same law has wanted to contribute to the public burdens of the Nation "

Without words ... right?