The seizure of 108 machines to a Bogotá operator by Coljuegos and to which they made tremendous hype, can be classified as a False Positive.
The reason is a bit technical but I will try to explain it in a way that I also understand: The operator came with a delay in payments of two months and almost at the expiration of the third, this managed to comply with the cancellation of one of them which came Making many months ago and this was the reason for the recession of the contract by the lawyer of Coljuegos. The operator transmitted the events through the Online system and this was what gave him because he must have the premises closed, but he never knew (I mean he had to close)
He was only notified of the loss of the contract at the time he knew he was going to confiscate the machines, ie he was not notified in legal form ... the administrative actions have terms and apparently did not comply; But what surprises me is that the day after the confiscation the operator, even though he was in a contract with another person, he received calls saying "they fixed the situation and returned the machines if he paid money" the question is how they knew who Was the real owner? Because it was not notified and protocols were complied with according to the law? Is anyone involved from within the institution? Why are you worried about a possible lawsuit? ... these are questions to investigate, not to go on a witch hunt for a number that doesn´t look well , by citing expresidents!
Other articles by the Author:
