The resolution that was published regarding land use put us at the same point where we were 8 years ago, they made us run with a legal solution that seems to me more like a white-collar slap for all of us located operator(s).

A resolution that comes at a very very bad time; moment in which the change of mayors, governors, and the entire administrative branch is going to begin and that, according to what is read, those of us who have a pending procedure - as in my case - are going to have four months to contribute it, that is, November, December, January , February… complicated, which outgoing official works or which incoming official gets soaked?

Or, chronicle of a new bloodletting: they sign us but for sure will ask for money under the table.

Inconvenient and puts us on the ropes and clashes with what the same resolution says in Article 3. Beginning. 11. By virtue of the principle of effectiveness, the authorities will seek to ensure that the procedures achieve their purpose, and, for this purpose, they will remove purely formal obstacles ex officio, they will avoid inhibitory decisions, delays or delays and they will clean up, in accordance with this Code, procedural irregularities. that are presented, in pursuit of the effectiveness of the material right that is the object of the administrative action.

I feel that it is a very convenient justification to get out of the scandal that they started creating, for something that is exactly what is happening: the entity agreed at the time to something in view of the moment of misinformation that reigned around those located and all ( we) act; that there was no resolution that made it official, I don't know; but now the current presidency of Coljuegos is doing the same: it accepts what was contributed and filed, but it is NOT applying the principle of good faith: I believe it but I don't believe it.